Skip to content
Study aid only. Verify against current guidelines before clinical use.

Free USMLE Step 2 CK Hematology and Oncology practice questions

8 original exam-style questions from the StepStash 2,500-question Step 2 CK qbank, each with a full explanation, an educational objective and a link to the matching study note. Try each one before you open the answer. Reviewed by Veli Bakalov, MD · @HemeOncBuddy.

Open the full 2,500-question Step 2 CK qbank

Question 1 · Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting · easy

A 56-year-old man comes to the infusion center for his first dose of chemotherapy. He has locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx and will receive cisplatin, 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, concurrently with radiation. He has never received chemotherapy and has no history of motion sickness. He has hypertension treated with amlodipine. He drinks 2 beers daily. Creatinine is 0.8 mg/dL, and serum electrolytes and liver tests are normal. Electrocardiogram shows a QTc of 420 msec. The pharmacist asks for the antiemetic orders.

Which of the following is the most appropriate antiemetic prophylaxis for this patient?

  1. Ondansetron and dexamethasone
  2. Ondansetron alone
  3. Aprepitant, ondansetron, dexamethasone, and olanzapine
  4. Lorazepam and ondansetron
  5. Metoclopramide and dexamethasone
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Aprepitant, ondansetron, dexamethasone, and olanzapine

Cisplatin is the prototype of highly emetogenic chemotherapy, causing emesis in more than 90% of patients without prophylaxis, with both an acute phase (first 24 hours, driven by serotonin) and a delayed phase (peaking at 48 to 72 hours, driven by substance P). ASCO and NCCN recommend a 4-drug regimen for adults receiving cisplatin or an anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide: an NK1 receptor antagonist (aprepitant or fosaprepitant), a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist (ondansetron, granisetron, or palonosetron), dexamethasone, and olanzapine, given on day 1, with dexamethasone and olanzapine continued on days 2 to 4 to cover the delayed phase. Aprepitant inhibits CYP3A4 and raises dexamethasone levels, so the steroid dose is reduced when they are combined. Olanzapine causes sedation, so a 5-mg dose at bedtime is an option. Preventing emesis completely from the first cycle is important because poorly controlled vomiting conditions anticipatory nausea in later cycles.

A. A 5-HT3 antagonist with dexamethasone is the standard 2-drug regimen for moderately emetogenic chemotherapy and leaves the delayed, substance P-mediated phase of cisplatin emesis undertreated. B. Ondansetron alone is suitable only for low-risk regimens. D. Lorazepam is used for anticipatory nausea and as an adjunct, not as core prophylaxis. E. Metoclopramide is a breakthrough agent; it is less effective than the recommended classes and causes extrapyramidal reactions.

Educational objective: The key takeaway is that highly emetogenic chemotherapy such as cisplatin requires prophylaxis with an NK1 antagonist, a 5-HT3 antagonist, dexamethasone, and olanzapine.
Grid matching antiemetic prophylaxis to emetic risk: four drugs for highly emetogenic chemotherapy, a 5-HT3 antagonist plus dexamethasone for moderate risk, with boxes for the aprepitant and dexamethasone interaction, breakthrough rescue and anticipatory nausea.
Highly emetogenic regimens get all four drug classes and moderate-risk regimens get two; breakthrough nausea gets a drug from a new class, and anticipatory nausea is best prevented by full control from cycle 1.

Read the study note on this topic

Reviewed by Veli Bakalov, MD · @HemeOncBuddy

Question 2 · Transfusion reactions · easy

A 42-year-old woman is receiving her first-ever red cell transfusion for symptomatic anemia from heavy uterine bleeding. She has a history of recurrent sinusitis and celiac disease. Eight minutes after the transfusion starts, she reports throat tightness and difficulty breathing. Temperature is 37.1 C (98.8 F), pulse is 128/min, respirations are 28/min, blood pressure is 74/40 mm Hg, and oxygen saturation is 88% on room air. Examination shows swelling of the lips and tongue, diffuse expiratory wheezing and flushed skin without urticaria. There is no flank pain, and urine in the catheter bag is clear yellow. The nurse has stopped the transfusion and is running normal saline.

Which of the following is the most appropriate immediate pharmacotherapy?

  1. Intravenous diphenhydramine
  2. Intramuscular epinephrine
  3. Intravenous methylprednisolone
  4. Intravenous furosemide
  5. Oral acetaminophen
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Intramuscular epinephrine

Hypotension, hypoxia, wheezing and angioedema within minutes of starting a transfusion define an anaphylactic transfusion reaction. That it occurs with her first-ever transfusion, in a woman with recurrent sinopulmonary infections and celiac disease (both associated with selective IgA deficiency), points to anti-IgA antibodies in an IgA-deficient recipient reacting to IgA in donor plasma. No prior transfusion is needed because these antibodies can form without known exposure.

The life-saving drug is epinephrine, given intramuscularly in the anterolateral thigh (0.3 to 0.5 mg of 1 mg/mL, repeated every 5 to 15 minutes as needed), which reverses vasodilation, bronchospasm and airway edema. The transfusion has correctly been stopped and saline started; supportive care includes oxygen, airway monitoring, fluid boluses and an inhaled bronchodilator, and the reaction is reported to the blood bank. Afterward, measure IgA and anti-IgA levels and give future transfusions as washed red cells or IgA-deficient products (plasma and platelets from IgA-deficient donors).

A. Diphenhydramine treats urticaria and pruritus in a mild allergic reaction and is only an adjunct in anaphylaxis; it does not treat hypotension or airway edema. C. Methylprednisolone has an onset of hours and does not reverse acute anaphylaxis. D. Furosemide treats transfusion-associated circulatory overload, which presents with hypertension, elevated JVP and crackles, not hypotension with angioedema. E. Acetaminophen is used for febrile nonhemolytic reactions; she is afebrile and in shock.

Educational objective: The key takeaway is that anaphylaxis during transfusion, classically with a first transfusion in IgA deficiency, is treated immediately with intramuscular epinephrine, followed by washed or IgA-deficient products in the future.
Timeline of transfusion reactions by onset: minutes (acute hemolytic from ABO error; allergic urticaria and anaphylaxis in IgA deficiency), within hours (febrile nonhemolytic from donor WBC cytokines; TRALI with low blood pressure and normal BNP versus TACO with high blood pressure and high BNP), days to 2 weeks (delayed hemolytic from minor antigens) and 1 to 2 weeks (transfusion-associated GVHD from donor T cells), each with its fix.
Onset time sorts transfusion reactions: minutes for ABO hemolysis and anaphylaxis, hours for febrile reactions, TRALI and TACO, days to 2 weeks for delayed hemolysis and 1 to 2 weeks for TA-GVHD. Leukoreduction, washing and irradiation each prevent a different one.

Read the study note on this topic

Reviewed by Veli Bakalov, MD · @HemeOncBuddy

Question 3 · Beta-thalassemia trait · medium

A 29-year-old man of Greek descent is referred because a preemployment complete blood count showed microcytosis. He feels well and has no history of bleeding, gastrointestinal symptoms, or chronic illness. His mother was told she had 'low iron' and took iron tablets for years without improvement. Examination shows no pallor or splenomegaly. Results are shown:
Hemoglobin12.4 g/dL
RBC count6.2 million/mm3
MCV64 fL
RDW13.5% (11.5 to 14.5)
Ferritin110 ng/mL
Transferrin saturation32%
The peripheral smear shows microcytic, hypochromic cells with numerous target cells.

Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in diagnosis?

  1. Bone marrow aspirate with iron stain
  2. Blood lead level
  3. Hemoglobin electrophoresis
  4. Colonoscopy
  5. Serum erythropoietin level
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Hemoglobin electrophoresis

This man has a very low MCV with only mild anemia, a high RBC count, a normal RDW, target cells, and normal iron studies. The Mentzer index (MCV divided by RBC count in millions) is 64 / 6.2, about 10, which is below 13 and favors thalassemia trait over iron deficiency. His Mediterranean ancestry and a mother whose "low iron" never responded to iron add to the picture. In thalassemia trait the marrow makes increased numbers of small cells, so the RBC count is preserved or high, unlike iron deficiency, in which production falls along with cell size.

The next step is hemoglobin electrophoresis (or high-performance liquid chromatography). An elevated HbA2 (above about 3.5%), sometimes with a modestly raised HbF, confirms beta-thalassemia trait. If electrophoresis is normal in this setting, alpha-thalassemia trait is likely; it is a diagnosis of exclusion or of DNA testing, because adult electrophoresis is normal. Confirming the diagnosis matters because it avoids repeated futile iron therapy (and iron overload) and allows reproductive counseling and partner testing.

A. A bone marrow iron stain looks for ringed sideroblasts, but sideroblastic anemia typically shows a high ferritin and saturation and is not suggested by a high RBC count with target cells; marrow examination is invasive and unnecessary here. B. Lead poisoning causes basophilic stippling and an exposure history, neither present. D. Colonoscopy evaluates iron deficiency in men and postmenopausal women, but his iron studies are normal. E. Erythropoietin levels help in suspected chronic kidney disease or polycythemia, not in isolated microcytosis.

Educational objective: The key takeaway is that marked microcytosis with a high RBC count, target cells, a Mentzer index below 13, and normal iron studies calls for hemoglobin electrophoresis, which shows an elevated HbA2 in beta-thalassemia trait.
MCV scale (microcytic under 80 fL, normocytic 80 to 100 fL, macrocytic over 100 fL) above two decision trees: microcytic anemia routed by ferritin and then serum iron to iron deficiency, anemia of chronic disease, thalassemia or sideroblastic anemia, and macrocytic anemia routed by hypersegmented neutrophils, then B12 and folate levels with MMA if borderline, to B12 deficiency (MMA high), folate deficiency (MMA normal) or non-megaloblastic causes.
Low ferritin means iron deficiency; otherwise serum iron sorts chronic disease (low), thalassemia (normal) and sideroblastic anemia (high). Hypersegmented neutrophils mean megaloblastic anemia: check B12 and folate levels, and when B12 is borderline MMA separates B12 deficiency (high) from folate deficiency (normal).

Read the study note on this topic

Reviewed by Veli Bakalov, MD · @HemeOncBuddy

Question 4 · Warfarin · medium

A 74-year-old man comes to the anticoagulation clinic for a routine INR check. He takes warfarin for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation after a stroke 3 years ago; his INR has been stable between 2.0 and 3.0 on the same dose for a year. Ten days ago, he began trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for a urinary tract infection, and he completed the course yesterday. He has had no bleeding, bruising, melena, hematuria or headache. Pulse is 76/min and irregularly irregular, and blood pressure is 128/76 mm Hg. Examination shows no ecchymoses, and stool is brown and guaiac-negative. Today's INR is 7.2. Hemoglobin is 13.8 g/dL, unchanged from 3 months ago. He has no planned procedures.

Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?

  1. Oral vitamin K 5 mg and resume warfarin tomorrow
  2. Intravenous vitamin K and 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate
  3. Hold warfarin and recheck the INR in 1 to 2 days
  4. Transfusion of fresh frozen plasma
  5. Stop warfarin and start apixaban today
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Hold warfarin and recheck the INR in 1 to 2 days

This patient has a supratherapeutic INR without bleeding, explained by a classic drug interaction: trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole inhibits CYP2C9 metabolism of S-warfarin and displaces it from albumin. For an INR between 4.5 and 10 with no bleeding, the American College of Chest Physicians guideline and the 2020 ACC expert consensus pathway recommend holding one or two doses of warfarin, rechecking the INR soon, and resuming at the same or a slightly reduced dose once the INR returns to range, without routine vitamin K. Randomized trials showed that low-dose oral vitamin K in this range lowers the INR faster but does not reduce bleeding or thromboembolism. The precipitating antibiotic has already been stopped, so the INR should drift down over a few days. Oral vitamin K (2.5 to 5 mg) is reserved for an INR above 10 without bleeding.

A. Oral vitamin K 5 mg is appropriate for an INR above 10, but at 7.2 it adds no clinical benefit and, in a patient with prior stroke, can cause warfarin resistance and a period of subtherapeutic anticoagulation. B. Intravenous vitamin K with 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate is for major or life-threatening bleeding, such as intracranial or gastrointestinal hemorrhage with instability; using it here exposes a high-risk patient to rebound thrombosis. D. Fresh frozen plasma is a slower, volume-heavy reversal agent inferior to prothrombin complex concentrate and has no role without bleeding. E. Switching to a DOAC may be reasonable later for a patient with labile INRs, but this patient has been stable for a year and the elevation has a transient, identified cause; starting apixaban while the INR is 7.2 would also stack anticoagulants.

Educational objective: The key takeaway is that an INR of 4.5 to 10 without bleeding is managed by holding warfarin and rechecking, with oral vitamin K reserved for an INR above 10 and IV vitamin K plus 4-factor PCC for major bleeding.
Schematic of factor Xa, thrombin and fibrin showing that warfarin blocks VKORC1 (vitamin K dependent factors), heparins act through antithrombin, apixaban, rivaroxaban and edoxaban block Xa, and dabigatran, argatroban and bivalirudin block thrombin, with reversal agents: IV vitamin K plus 4-factor PCC for warfarin, protamine (full for unfractionated heparin, partial for LMWH), 4-factor PCC for the Xa inhibitors with andexanet alfa withdrawn in the US, and idarucizumab for dabigatran; argatroban and bivalirudin have no reversal agent and are short acting.
Where each anticoagulant acts on the Xa to thrombin to fibrin path, and its reversal: IV vitamin K plus 4-factor PCC for warfarin, protamine (full for unfractionated heparin, partial for LMWH), 4-factor PCC for Xa inhibitors and idarucizumab for dabigatran.

Read the study note on this topic

Reviewed by Veli Bakalov, MD · @HemeOncBuddy

Question 5 · Aplastic anemia · medium

A 63-year-old man with severe aplastic anemia is hospitalized on day 5 of horse antithymocyte globulin, cyclosporine, and eltrombopag. He has no matched sibling, and the transplant team has listed him for possible unrelated-donor transplantation if he does not respond. This morning he has new gum bleeding and scattered petechiae. Temperature is 37.1 C (98.8 F), pulse is 98/min, and blood pressure is 132/78 mm Hg. Hemoglobin is 6.9 g/dL, absolute neutrophil count 280/uL, and platelet count 6,000/uL. His adult son is at the bedside and offers to donate blood for his father right away. Platelets and red cells are ordered.

Which of the following is the most appropriate choice of blood products for this patient?

  1. Directed-donation platelets and red cells from his son
  2. Nonirradiated, leukoreduced products from unrelated volunteer donors
  3. Irradiated, leukoreduced products from unrelated volunteer donors
  4. Washed, nonirradiated products from unrelated volunteer donors
  5. Fresh whole blood from his son
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Irradiated, leukoreduced products from unrelated volunteer donors

Patients with aplastic anemia, especially while receiving antithymocyte globulin and when they are potential transplant candidates, should receive irradiated, leukoreduced blood products from unrelated donors. He clearly needs transfusion now: platelets for bleeding and a count below 10,000/uL, and red cells for a hemoglobin below 7 g/dL.

Each feature has a reason. Irradiation inactivates donor T lymphocytes, preventing transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease, which is nearly always fatal in a patient whose T cells are being depleted by ATG. Leukoreduction lowers the rate of HLA alloimmunization (which causes platelet refractoriness and graft rejection), CMV transmission, and febrile nonhemolytic reactions. Products from family members are avoided because they sensitize the recipient to minor histocompatibility antigens that a related or haploidentical donor might share, raising the risk of graft rejection; directed donation from a first-degree relative also carries a higher risk of transfusion-associated GVHD because of shared HLA haplotypes. Transfusions should still be kept to the minimum needed.

A. Directed donation from his son is wrong on two counts: it risks sensitization against a potential donor and, if unirradiated, transfusion-associated GVHD from partially HLA-matched lymphocytes. B. Leukoreduction alone does not reliably remove enough viable T cells to prevent transfusion-associated GVHD; irradiation is required during ATG therapy. D. Washing removes plasma proteins and helps prevent allergic reactions or reactions in IgA-deficient patients, but it does not inactivate lymphocytes. E. Fresh whole blood from a relative combines every risk: unirradiated lymphocytes, HLA sensitization against a family donor, and no component targeting.

Educational objective: The key takeaway is that patients with aplastic anemia receiving ATG or awaiting transplant should get irradiated, leukoreduced products from unrelated donors and avoid transfusions from family members.
Management ladder for aplastic anemia: confirm the diagnosis, screen for a PNH clone and Fanconi anemia, give supportive care, then in severe disease choose matched-sibling HSCT for a younger patient or horse ATG, cyclosporine and eltrombopag for everyone else.
Confirm, screen and support every patient; in severe disease, matched-sibling HSCT if younger (generally under 40 to 50), otherwise horse ATG + cyclosporine + eltrombopag.

Read the study note on this topic

Reviewed by Veli Bakalov, MD · @HemeOncBuddy

Question 6 · Immune-Related Adverse Events · medium

A 48-year-old woman with stage IV melanoma comes to the oncology clinic because of 2 weeks of worsening frontal headache, fatigue, nausea and light-headedness when standing. She has received 3 cycles of ipilimumab plus nivolumab. Blood pressure is 98/62 mm Hg supine and 84/56 mm Hg standing; pulse is 104/min. Visual fields are full. MRI of the brain shows a diffusely enlarged pituitary gland without metastases. Laboratory results are shown below.
TestResult
Sodium131 mEq/L
Potassium4.2 mEq/L
Glucose74 mg/dL
Morning cortisol1.9 mcg/dL (5 to 23)
ACTH4 pg/mL (10 to 60)
TSH0.2 microU/mL (0.4 to 4.0)
Free T40.5 ng/dL (0.8 to 1.8)

Which of the following is the most appropriate initial pharmacotherapy?

  1. Levothyroxine
  2. Hydrocortisone
  3. Fludrocortisone
  4. Infliximab
  5. Cabergoline
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Hydrocortisone

Headache, fatigue and an enlarged pituitary gland in a patient receiving ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4), especially combined with nivolumab, indicate immune checkpoint inhibitor hypophysitis. The labs show central (secondary) adrenal insufficiency, with a low cortisol and an inappropriately low ACTH, plus central hypothyroidism, with a low free T4 and a low or inappropriately normal TSH. Potassium is normal because the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis is intact in pituitary disease. Her orthostatic hypotension, hyponatremia and low-normal glucose show that cortisol deficiency is clinically significant.

The first drug is a glucocorticoid: hydrocortisone at physiologic replacement doses (higher stress doses if she were in crisis). Levothyroxine is added only after glucocorticoid replacement has begun, usually several days later, because thyroid hormone increases cortisol metabolism and can precipitate adrenal crisis. Endocrine irAEs are treated with hormone replacement, and high-dose immunosuppressive steroids are reserved for severe mass effect such as visual compromise or intractable headache. Replacement is usually lifelong, and the checkpoint inhibitor can often be resumed once she is stable.

A. Levothyroxine first is the classic error; it accelerates cortisol clearance in a patient with untreated adrenal insufficiency. C. Fludrocortisone is needed for primary adrenalitis, where aldosterone is lost (hyperkalemia, high ACTH), not for central adrenal insufficiency. D. Infliximab is the second-line agent for steroid-refractory immune colitis and plays no role in hypophysitis. E. Cabergoline treats prolactinomas and hyperprolactinemia, not inflammatory pituitary failure.

Educational objective: The key takeaway is that ipilimumab hypophysitis causes central adrenal insufficiency and central hypothyroidism, and hydrocortisone must be started before levothyroxine to avoid precipitating adrenal crisis.
Flow from TSH and free T4 to three endocrine irAE patterns: thyrotoxicosis from destructive thyroiditis with low radioiodine uptake (beta-blocker, no antithyroid drugs, often followed by permanent hypothyroidism), primary hypothyroidism (levothyroxine, continue the inhibitor), and central hypothyroidism from hypophysitis, classically with ipilimumab (hydrocortisone before levothyroxine), with a footer on primary adrenalitis and checkpoint type 1 diabetes.
Endocrine irAEs: the TSH and free T4 pattern separates thyroiditis, primary hypothyroidism and hypophysitis; primary adrenalitis needs hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone, and checkpoint diabetes needs lifelong insulin.

Read the study note on this topic

Reviewed by Veli Bakalov, MD · @HemeOncBuddy

Question 7 · Thrombophilia testing · hard

A 31-year-old woman comes to the office 10 days after being diagnosed with an unprovoked proximal deep venous thrombosis of the right leg. She was started on apixaban in the emergency department and is tolerating it well. She has not used estrogen-containing contraception for 2 years, has had no recent surgery, travel or immobility, and has no history of pregnancy loss. Her mother had a pulmonary embolism at age 38 and her maternal uncle had recurrent leg clots. She plans to become pregnant in the next few years and would like to know whether she carries an inherited clotting disorder. Examination shows mild residual right calf swelling. CBC and metabolic panel are normal.

Which of the following tests can be interpreted reliably at this time?

  1. Antithrombin activity
  2. Free protein S antigen
  3. Lupus anticoagulant (dilute Russell viper venom time)
  4. Protein C activity
  5. Factor V Leiden genotyping by PCR
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: E. Factor V Leiden genotyping by PCR

Thrombophilia testing is reasonable here because the result could change management: she is young, the clot was unprovoked, she has a strong family history, and pregnancy planning (and counseling of relatives) may depend on the answer. The question is which tests are valid now, 10 days after an acute clot and while she takes a DOAC.

Genetic tests for factor V Leiden and the prothrombin G20210A mutation detect a DNA sequence and are unaffected by acute thrombosis, heparin, warfarin or direct oral anticoagulants, so they can be sent at any time. Factor V Leiden is the most common inherited thrombophilia, especially in people of European ancestry, and its interaction with estrogen and pregnancy makes it particularly relevant to her plans.

Functional assays are distorted in this setting. An acute clot consumes natural anticoagulants, heparin lowers antithrombin, warfarin lowers proteins C and S, and DOACs interfere with clot-based assays. Guidance (ASH and the British Society for Haematology) is to defer these assays until at least 3 months after the event and, when possible, off anticoagulation, without ever stopping treatment of an acute clot simply to test.

A. Antithrombin activity falls with acute thrombosis and can be falsely low, and anti-Xa based assays are affected by apixaban. B. Free protein S falls with acute thrombosis, inflammation, pregnancy and estrogen, so a low value now proves nothing. C. Lupus anticoagulant clotting assays, including the dRVVT, give false positives on DOACs and heparin. D. Protein C activity is consumed by the acute clot and is unreliable until months later.

Educational objective: The key takeaway is that factor V Leiden and prothrombin gene PCR are valid at any time, whereas protein C, protein S, antithrombin and lupus anticoagulant testing should wait at least 3 months after the clot and ideally off anticoagulation.
Workup flow for thrombophilia testing: who is reasonable to test and when to skip it, a timeline showing genetic PCR tests valid at any time but functional assays valid only 3 or more months after the event and off anticoagulation, site clues that point to JAK2, PNH flow cytometry or renal vein thrombosis, and the limited occult cancer search after unprovoked VTE.
Test only when the result changes management. PCR for factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A is valid any time; protein C, protein S, antithrombin and lupus anticoagulant wait until at least 3 months after the event, off anticoagulation.

Read the study note on this topic

Reviewed by Veli Bakalov, MD · @HemeOncBuddy

Question 8 · Multiple myeloma · hard

A 58-year-old man is referred to the hematology clinic after an elevated total protein was found on routine testing. He feels well and has no bone pain. Examination is normal. Bone marrow biopsy shows 34% clonal lambda-restricted plasma cells. Whole-body low-dose CT shows no lytic lesions. Additional results are shown.
TestResult
Hemoglobin12.6 g/dL
Calcium9.6 mg/dL
Creatinine1.0 mg/dL
Serum M-protein (IgA lambda)2.6 g/dL
Serum free lambda light chain1,480 mg/L (reference 5.7 to 26.3)
Serum free kappa light chain11.2 mg/L (reference 3.3 to 19.4)
Beta-2 microglobulin3.9 mg/L (reference 0.7 to 1.8)

Which of the following findings in this patient establishes a diagnosis of multiple myeloma that warrants treatment?

  1. Bone marrow clonal plasma cells of 34%
  2. Free light chain ratio above 100
  3. Serum beta-2 microglobulin of 3.9 mg/L
  4. IgA isotype of the monoclonal protein
  5. Serum M-protein of 2.6 g/dL
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Free light chain ratio above 100

This asymptomatic man has no CRAB features: hemoglobin is above 10 g/dL, calcium and creatinine are normal, and CT shows no lytic lesions. On marrow burden alone (10% to 60% clonal plasma cells) he would be classified as smoldering myeloma and observed. However, the 2014 International Myeloma Working Group criteria added three SLiM biomarkers that predict about an 80% risk of progression to end-organ damage within 2 years and therefore define active myeloma even without CRAB: Sixty percent or more clonal marrow plasma cells, an involved to uninvolved serum free Light chain ratio of 100 or more (with the involved light chain at least 100 mg/L), and more than one focal lesion 5 mm or larger on MRI. Here the lambda to kappa ratio is 1,480 / 11.2, about 132, and the involved lambda level is far above 100 mg/L. This single biomarker converts the diagnosis from smoldering to active multiple myeloma, and treatment is indicated.

A. Bone marrow clonal plasma cells of 34% meet the 10% threshold for myeloma but fall in the smoldering range; only 60% or more is a myeloma-defining event. C. Serum beta-2 microglobulin of 3.9 mg/L is used with albumin (and LDH and cytogenetics in the revised system) to stage established myeloma; it is prognostic, not diagnostic. D. IgA isotype of the monoclonal protein is a modest risk factor for progression of MGUS and smoldering disease but is not a myeloma-defining event. E. Serum M-protein of 2.6 g/dL is below even the 3 g/dL smoldering threshold, and the size of the spike alone never mandates treatment.

Educational objective: The key takeaway is that an involved to uninvolved serum free light chain ratio of 100 or more is a SLiM myeloma-defining event that establishes active myeloma requiring treatment even without CRAB features.
Three-row decision ladder for a clonal plasma cell disorder: any CRAB or SLiM myeloma-defining event means multiple myeloma (treat); otherwise an M-protein of 3 g/dL or more and/or 10 to 60% clonal marrow plasma cells means smoldering myeloma (about 10% per year for 5 years, close monitoring); otherwise MGUS (about 1% per year, surveillance).
Check for a myeloma-defining event (CRAB or SLiM) first, then tumor burden: smoldering myeloma needs M-protein ≥3 g/dL or 10 to 60% plasma cells, and anything below both is MGUS.

Read the study note on this topic

Reviewed by Veli Bakalov, MD · @HemeOncBuddy

Build a timed block from the full 2,500-question Step 2 CK qbank

Free USMLE Step 2 CK practice questions · Free Step 1 questions